Skip to main content

Molecular Biology

Counseling & Disciplinary Action

In the clinical laboratory, personnel management is not solely about hiring and scheduling; it also involves the difficult task of correcting performance. Because the output of a molecular laboratory directly dictates patient diagnosis and treatment - often involving life-altering genetic information or infectious disease management - standards for accuracy and conduct are rigorously enforced. Counseling and disciplinary action are the mechanisms used to address performance gaps, safety violations, or behavioral issues. The goal of these processes is rarely punitive; rather, the objective is remediation - correcting the behavior to ensure patient safety and retain a qualified employee

The “Just Culture” Philosophy

Modern laboratory administration has moved away from a “Blame and Shame” culture toward a “Just Culture.” This framework recognizes that competent professionals make mistakes and that system failures often contribute to individual errors. Before initiating disciplinary action, the manager must categorize the behavior to determine the appropriate response

  • Human Error (Unintentional): An inadvertent slip or lapse (e.g., knocking over a rack of tubes or mislabeling a sample due to fatigue)
    • Response: Console and Coach.: Discipline is not appropriate. The solution involves changing the workflow or environment to prevent recurrence (e.g., adding barcode scanners)
  • At-Risk Behavior (Drift): A conscious choice to take a shortcut where the risk is not fully appreciated (e.g., skipping the “Two-Patient Identifier” check because the lab is busy, or entering the Post-PCR room with Pre-PCR PPE)
    • Response: Counseling and Retraining.: The employee must be coached on why the rule exists and the danger of the shortcut
  • Reckless Behavior (Negligence): A conscious disregard for a substantial and unjustifiable risk (e.g., falsifying QC data to release results, working while intoxicated, or intentionally disabling safety alarms)
    • Response: Disciplinary Action.: This requires formal punishment up to and including termination

The Progressive Discipline Policy

When counseling fails or when a violation is serious, the laboratory follows a standardized legal framework known as Progressive Discipline. This ensures fairness (Due Process) and protects the institution from wrongful termination lawsuits by establishing a clear paper trail of the problem and the attempts to fix it

  • Step 1: Verbal Warning
    • A formal conversation between the manager and the employee. Although called “verbal,” it is documented in the personnel file
    • Content: “You arrived late three times this month. Shift start times are critical for batch PCR setup. Continued lateness will result in further action.”
  • Step 2: Written Warning
    • A formal document outlining the specific rule violated, the prior verbal warning, and the facts of the current incident
    • Signatures: The employee is required to sign this document. The signature indicates receipt: of the warning, not necessarily agreement with it. The employee usually has the right to attach a written rebuttal
  • Step 3: Suspension (or Final Written Warning)
    • The employee is removed from the schedule (often without pay) for a set period (e.g., 3 days). This serves as a “final wake-up call” that employment is in jeopardy
  • Step 4: Termination
    • The permanent separation of the employee from the organization. This occurs when previous steps fail to correct the behavior or immediately following an act of “Gross Misconduct.”
  • Gross Misconduct (Immediate Termination)
    • Certain actions bypass the progressive steps and result in immediate firing. In a molecular lab, this typically includes falsification of results, HIPAA violations (snooping in patient records), or theft of controlled substances/ethanol

Counseling vs. Disciplinary Action

It is crucial for an entry-level scientist to distinguish between non-punitive coaching (Counseling) and punitive measures (Discipline)

  • Performance Counseling (Coaching)
    • Goal: Improvement and education
    • Scenario: A scientist is consistently getting “Low Yield” on DNA extractions
    • Action: The supervisor reviews the technique, identifies that the scientist is not vortexing the beads long enough, and demonstrates the correct method. No permanent mark is placed on the employee’s record. This is a “Course Correction.”
  • Corrective Action (Discipline)
    • Goal: Compliance and documentation
    • Scenario: A scientist is caught pipetting mouth-to-tube or eating in the Clean Room
    • Action: This is a safety violation that endangers staff and the facility (contamination). A formal warning is issued

Performance Improvement Plans (PIP)

When a scientist struggles with technical competency rather than behavioral conduct, a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) is often utilized. This is a formal roadmap designed to help the employee succeed rather than punish them

  • SMART Goals: The PIP outlines specific, measurable goals
    • Example: “The employee must successfully complete 5 consecutive sequencing runs with a Q30 score >85% within the next 30 days.”
  • Regular Check-Ins: The manager and employee meet weekly to review progress
  • Outcome: If the goals are met, the PIP is closed, and the employee returns to good standing. If the goals are not met, the process moves to termination due to “Inability to Perform Job Duties.”

Specific Triggers in Molecular Biology

While general attendance and attitude issues are common across all jobs, specific technical infractions in molecular biology trigger immediate administrative intervention due to the sensitive nature of the work

  • Breaking Unidirectional Workflow: A scientist walking from the Post-PCR (Dirty) room back into the Master Mix (Clean) room without showering/changing is a critical offense. This can contaminate the entire lab, causing false positives for weeks and requiring a total shutdown for decontamination. This is usually treated as “At-Risk” or “Reckless” behavior
  • Falsifying Quality Control: If a scientist’s run fails QC, and they override the flag or manually alter the data to make it pass so they can go home on time, this is immediate grounds for termination. It compromises patient safety and the integrity of the license
  • Specimen Integrity Violations: Intentionally hiding a dropped/spilled sample or failing to report a “sample swap” incident. Honesty is the primary currency of the laboratory; hiding an error is worse than making one

Documentation & Due Process

For any disciplinary action to be valid, it must be objective, factual, and documented. “If it isn’t written down, it didn’t happen.”

  • Objective Facts: Write-ups must focus on behavior, not personality
    • Incorrect: “The employee is lazy and careless.”
    • Correct: “The employee failed to perform the daily maintenance wash on the analyzer on 10/12 and 10/14, resulting in a nozzle clog and run failure.”
  • The Right to Representation: In unionized laboratories, employees have the right to have a union steward present during any conversation that could lead to discipline (Weingarten Rights). Management cannot force an employee to waive this right